IUKL Library
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Taking the EU to Court : Annulment Proceedings and Multilevel Judicial Conflict.

By: Adam, christian.
Contributor(s): Bauer, Michael W | Hartlapp, Miriam | Mathieu, Emmanuelle.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics Series: Publisher: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2019Copyright date: �2020Edition: 1st ed.Description: 1 online resource (250 pages).Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783030216290.Genre/Form: Electronic books.DDC classification: 320.6094 Online resources: Click to View
Contents:
Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Praise for Taking the EU to Court -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Abbreviations -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1 The Neglected Politics Behind EU Annulment Litigation -- Policy and Institutional Relevance of Annulments -- Annulment Over Time and Across Policy Areas: Empirical Evidence -- Structure of the Book -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 2 Towards an Analytical Framework to Study Annulments in the EU -- Research Questions -- Multilevel Governance and Conflict in the EU -- EU Policy Making and Litigant Configurations -- Judicial Politics and Judicial Success -- Conceptualizing Multilevel Annulment Conflict -- Horizontal v. Vertical Conflict -- Simple v. Complex Conflicts -- A Multilevel and Multi-step Analytical Approach -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 3 The Legal Background -- Actions for Annulment: Some Essentials -- An Evolving Set of Reviewable Acts -- An Evolving List of Applicants -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 4 Studying Annulment Actions -- Research Strategy -- Case Selection -- Data -- Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 5 Motivations: When Conflict Leads to Litigation -- Conceptualizing Motivations for Litigation -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Ideology -- Political Trust -- Empirical Analysis -- The Legal Factor -- Material Gains-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation -- The Potato Starch Case (T-557/13) -- Adjustment of Salaries and Pensions of Eurocrats (C-196/12, C-66/12, C-63/12) -- Institutional Competences-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation -- The Renewable Energies Law Case (T-134/14 and T-47/15) -- The Leipzig Halle Case (T-396/08) and the Dresden Airport Case (T-215/09) -- Procedural Competences in Trade Negotiations (C-22/70 and C-425/13) -- The Selective Tax Benefits Cases (T-219/10, T-399/11).
Ideology-Driven Cases in Annulment Litigation -- The EPSO and Patent Package Cases (T-148/13, T-149/13, T-191/13, C-274/11, C-147/13) -- Passenger Rights (C-317/04 and C-318/04) -- The Private Pension Market Case (C-57/95) -- Political Trust-Driven Annulment Cases -- Toy Safety Case (T-198-12) -- The Molluscs Case (T-204/11) -- BMW Case (T-671/14) -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 6 Litigant Configurations: Turbulence and the Emergence of Complex Configurations -- Engaging with Complexity -- Theorizing Complex Litigant Configurations -- Complex Litigant Patterns in the Face of Institutional Turbulence -- The Expanded Tobacco Case (T-170/03) -- Spanish Coal Case (T-57/11) -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 7 Litigant Success: How Litigant Configurations Relate to Legal Outcomes -- Litigant Configurations and Judicial Success: What We Know -- Litigant Configurations and Endogeneity: A New Approach -- Litigant Configurations and Legal Reasoning -- Empirical Patterns of Litigant Configurations and Legal Success -- Distributive Effects and Feedback of Winning or Losing a Case -- Winning Can Be Aligned with Legal Success -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Ideological and Policy Preferences -- Winning Can Be Disconnected from Legal Success -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Political Trust -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 8 The Political Side of EU Annulment Litigation -- The Motivations Behind Annulment Actions -- Actor Configurations in Annulment Conflicts -- Success, Failure, and Feedback Effects -- Beyond the State of the Art: How Explaining Annulment Cases Challenge Common Research Perspectives -- References -- Correction to: Taking the EU to Court.
Correction to: C. Adam et al., Taking the EU to Court, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0 -- Annexes -- References -- Index.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Item holds
E-book E-book IUKL Library
Subscripti 1 Available
Total holds: 0

Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Praise for Taking the EU to Court -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Abbreviations -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1 The Neglected Politics Behind EU Annulment Litigation -- Policy and Institutional Relevance of Annulments -- Annulment Over Time and Across Policy Areas: Empirical Evidence -- Structure of the Book -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 2 Towards an Analytical Framework to Study Annulments in the EU -- Research Questions -- Multilevel Governance and Conflict in the EU -- EU Policy Making and Litigant Configurations -- Judicial Politics and Judicial Success -- Conceptualizing Multilevel Annulment Conflict -- Horizontal v. Vertical Conflict -- Simple v. Complex Conflicts -- A Multilevel and Multi-step Analytical Approach -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 3 The Legal Background -- Actions for Annulment: Some Essentials -- An Evolving Set of Reviewable Acts -- An Evolving List of Applicants -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 4 Studying Annulment Actions -- Research Strategy -- Case Selection -- Data -- Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 5 Motivations: When Conflict Leads to Litigation -- Conceptualizing Motivations for Litigation -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Ideology -- Political Trust -- Empirical Analysis -- The Legal Factor -- Material Gains-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation -- The Potato Starch Case (T-557/13) -- Adjustment of Salaries and Pensions of Eurocrats (C-196/12, C-66/12, C-63/12) -- Institutional Competences-Driven Motivation in Annulment Litigation -- The Renewable Energies Law Case (T-134/14 and T-47/15) -- The Leipzig Halle Case (T-396/08) and the Dresden Airport Case (T-215/09) -- Procedural Competences in Trade Negotiations (C-22/70 and C-425/13) -- The Selective Tax Benefits Cases (T-219/10, T-399/11).

Ideology-Driven Cases in Annulment Litigation -- The EPSO and Patent Package Cases (T-148/13, T-149/13, T-191/13, C-274/11, C-147/13) -- Passenger Rights (C-317/04 and C-318/04) -- The Private Pension Market Case (C-57/95) -- Political Trust-Driven Annulment Cases -- Toy Safety Case (T-198-12) -- The Molluscs Case (T-204/11) -- BMW Case (T-671/14) -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 6 Litigant Configurations: Turbulence and the Emergence of Complex Configurations -- Engaging with Complexity -- Theorizing Complex Litigant Configurations -- Complex Litigant Patterns in the Face of Institutional Turbulence -- The Expanded Tobacco Case (T-170/03) -- Spanish Coal Case (T-57/11) -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 7 Litigant Success: How Litigant Configurations Relate to Legal Outcomes -- Litigant Configurations and Judicial Success: What We Know -- Litigant Configurations and Endogeneity: A New Approach -- Litigant Configurations and Legal Reasoning -- Empirical Patterns of Litigant Configurations and Legal Success -- Distributive Effects and Feedback of Winning or Losing a Case -- Winning Can Be Aligned with Legal Success -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Ideological and Policy Preferences -- Winning Can Be Disconnected from Legal Success -- Material Gains -- Institutional Competences -- Political Trust -- Conclusion -- Cases Cited -- References -- Chapter 8 The Political Side of EU Annulment Litigation -- The Motivations Behind Annulment Actions -- Actor Configurations in Annulment Conflicts -- Success, Failure, and Feedback Effects -- Beyond the State of the Art: How Explaining Annulment Cases Challenge Common Research Perspectives -- References -- Correction to: Taking the EU to Court.

Correction to: C. Adam et al., Taking the EU to Court, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21629-0 -- Annexes -- References -- Index.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2023. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
The Library's homepage is at http://library.iukl.edu.my/.