IUKL Library
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

On the Path to AI : Law's Prophecies and the Conceptual Foundations of the Machine Learning Age.

By: Grant, Thomas D.
Contributor(s): Wischik, Damon J.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2020Copyright date: �2020Edition: 1st ed.Description: 1 online resource (163 pages).Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783030435820.Genre/Form: Electronic books.DDC classification: 303.4834 Online resources: Click to View
Contents:
Intro -- Prologue-Starting with Logic -- Holmes and His Legacy -- A Note on Terminology: Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and Neural Networks -- Notes -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Abbreviations -- 1 Two Revolutions -- 1.1 An Analogy and Why We're Making It -- 1.2 What the Analogy Between a Nineteenth Century Jurist and Machine Learning Can Tell Us -- 1.3 Applications of Machine Learning in Law-And Everywhere Else -- 1.4 Two Revolutions with a Common Ancestor -- 2 Getting Past Logic -- 2.1 Formalism in Law and Algorithms in Computing -- 2.2 Getting Past Algorithms -- 2.3 The Persistence of Algorithmic Logic -- 3 Experience and Data as Input -- 3.1 Experience Is Input for Law -- 3.2 Data Is Input for Machine Learning -- 3.3 The Breadth of Experience and the Limits of Data -- 4 Finding Patterns as the Path from Input to Output -- 4.1 Pattern Finding in Law -- 4.2 So Many Problems Can Be Solved by Pure Curve Fitting -- 4.3 Noisy Data, Contested Patterns -- 5 Output as Prophecy -- 5.1 Prophecies Are What Law Is -- 5.2 Prediction Is What Machine Learning Output Is -- 5.3 Limits of the Analogy -- 5.4 Probabilistic Reasoning and Prediction -- 6 Explanations of Machine Learning -- 6.1 Holmes's "Inarticulate Major Premise" -- 6.2 Machine Learning's Inarticulate Major Premise -- 6.3 The Two Cultures: Scientific Explanation Versus Machine Learning Prediction -- 6.4 Why We Still Want Explanations -- 7 Juries and Other Reliable Predictors -- 7.1 Problems with Juries, Problems with Machines -- 7.2 What to Do About the Predictors? -- 8 Poisonous Datasets, Poisonous Trees -- 8.1 The Problem of Bad Evidence -- 8.2 Data Pruning -- 8.3 Inferential Restraint -- 8.4 Executional Restraint -- 8.5 Poisonous Pasts and Future Growth -- 9 From Holmes to AlphaGo -- 9.1 Accumulating Experience -- 9.2 Legal Explanations, Decisions, and Predictions.
9.3 G�odel, Turing, and Holmes -- 9.4 What Machine Learning Can Learn from Holmes and Turing -- 10 Conclusion -- 10.1 Holmes as Futurist -- 10.2 Where Did Holmes Think Law Was Going, and Might Computer Science Follow? -- 10.3 Lessons for Lawyers and Other Laypeople -- Epilogue: Lessons in Two Directions -- A Data Scientist's View -- A Lawyer's View -- Selected Bibliography -- Index.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Item holds
E-book E-book IUKL Library
Subscripti 1 Available
Total holds: 0

Intro -- Prologue-Starting with Logic -- Holmes and His Legacy -- A Note on Terminology: Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and Neural Networks -- Notes -- Contents -- About the Authors -- Abbreviations -- 1 Two Revolutions -- 1.1 An Analogy and Why We're Making It -- 1.2 What the Analogy Between a Nineteenth Century Jurist and Machine Learning Can Tell Us -- 1.3 Applications of Machine Learning in Law-And Everywhere Else -- 1.4 Two Revolutions with a Common Ancestor -- 2 Getting Past Logic -- 2.1 Formalism in Law and Algorithms in Computing -- 2.2 Getting Past Algorithms -- 2.3 The Persistence of Algorithmic Logic -- 3 Experience and Data as Input -- 3.1 Experience Is Input for Law -- 3.2 Data Is Input for Machine Learning -- 3.3 The Breadth of Experience and the Limits of Data -- 4 Finding Patterns as the Path from Input to Output -- 4.1 Pattern Finding in Law -- 4.2 So Many Problems Can Be Solved by Pure Curve Fitting -- 4.3 Noisy Data, Contested Patterns -- 5 Output as Prophecy -- 5.1 Prophecies Are What Law Is -- 5.2 Prediction Is What Machine Learning Output Is -- 5.3 Limits of the Analogy -- 5.4 Probabilistic Reasoning and Prediction -- 6 Explanations of Machine Learning -- 6.1 Holmes's "Inarticulate Major Premise" -- 6.2 Machine Learning's Inarticulate Major Premise -- 6.3 The Two Cultures: Scientific Explanation Versus Machine Learning Prediction -- 6.4 Why We Still Want Explanations -- 7 Juries and Other Reliable Predictors -- 7.1 Problems with Juries, Problems with Machines -- 7.2 What to Do About the Predictors? -- 8 Poisonous Datasets, Poisonous Trees -- 8.1 The Problem of Bad Evidence -- 8.2 Data Pruning -- 8.3 Inferential Restraint -- 8.4 Executional Restraint -- 8.5 Poisonous Pasts and Future Growth -- 9 From Holmes to AlphaGo -- 9.1 Accumulating Experience -- 9.2 Legal Explanations, Decisions, and Predictions.

9.3 G�odel, Turing, and Holmes -- 9.4 What Machine Learning Can Learn from Holmes and Turing -- 10 Conclusion -- 10.1 Holmes as Futurist -- 10.2 Where Did Holmes Think Law Was Going, and Might Computer Science Follow? -- 10.3 Lessons for Lawyers and Other Laypeople -- Epilogue: Lessons in Two Directions -- A Data Scientist's View -- A Lawyer's View -- Selected Bibliography -- Index.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2023. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
The Library's homepage is at http://library.iukl.edu.my/.