000			03238nam a2200397 i 4500
001			ebr10789659
003			CaPaEBR
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			990301s1999 gw a ob 001 0 eng d
020			_a9783110802832 (e-book)
020			_z9783110158298
040			_aCaPaEBR _beng _erda _epn _cCaPaEBR
035			_a(OCoLC)868974141
050	1	4	_aBD581 _b.K65 1999eb
082	0	4	_a179/.1 _221
100	1		_aKrebs, Angelika, _d1961-
245	1	0	_aEthics of nature : _ba map / _cAngelika Krebs ; with a foreword by Bernard Williams.
264		1	_aBerlin ; _aNew York : _bW. de Gruyter, _c1999.
300			_a1 online resource (180 pages) : _billustrations.
336			_atext _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aPerspectives in analytical philosophy = _aPerspektiven der analytischen Philosophie ; _vBd. 22
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [139]-156) and index.
505	0	0	_tGuest Foreword / _rBernard Williams -- _tSynopsis of Argument -- _tWhy an Ethics of Nature? -- _tThe Philosophical Discipline of the Ethics of Nature -- _tThe Objective of This Study -- _tBasic Concepts -- _tNature -- _tA Definition of "Nature" for Environmental Ethics -- _tOikos, Cosmos, and the Human Body -- _tConservation versus Cultivation of Nature -- _tEthics -- _tThe Object of Ethics and the Distinction between Intrinsic and Instrumental Value -- _tGood Human Life and Right Human Life -- _tGood Human Life -- _tThe Core -- _tBasic Options -- _tLuxury -- _tThe Well-Being and the Agency Aspect of Good Human Life -- _tThe Hedonistic Challenge -- _tThree Forms of Pleasure -- _tAn Answer to the Hedonistic Challenge -- _tThe Objection to Paternalism -- _tMoral Concern and Self-Interest -- _tThe Hermeneutics and the Justification of Moral Culture -- _tAnthropocentrism versus Physiocentrism -- _tThe Boundaries of the Moral Universe - "Extensional Anthropocentrism" versus "Extensional Physiocentrism" -- _tThe Absolute Strategy in the Ethics of Nature - "Epistemic Anthropocentrism" versus "Epistemic Physiocentrism" -- _tSeven Anthropocentric Arguments for the Value of Nature -- _tThe Basic Needs Argument -- _tClassical Thoughts -- _tThe Argument -- _tLost Peace with Nature? The Need for Environmental History -- _tSome Reasons Why the Basic Needs Argument Is Not as Effective as You Might Expect -- _tTwo Versions of the Basic Needs Argument which Incorporate Intrinsic Value Claims for Nature -- _t"Nature Knows Best" -- _tThe Motivational Version -- _tThe Aisthesis Argument -- _tLiterary Thoughts -- _tThe Argument.
588			_aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (ebrary, viewed November 13, 2013).
590			_aElectronic reproduction. Palo Alto, Calif. : ebrary, 2013. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ebrary affiliated libraries.
650		0	_aEnvironmental ethics.
650		0	_aPhilosophy of nature.
655		0	_aElectronic books.
797	2		_aebrary.
830		0	_aPerspectives in analytical philosophy ; _vBd. 22.
856	4	0	_uhttp://site.ebrary.com/lib/kliuc/Doc?id=10789659 _zAn electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view
942			_2lcc _cEBK
999			_c218111 _d218111